بررسی تأثیر متغیرهای کلان اقتصادی بر ریسک سیستماتیک ۵۰ شرکت برتر بورس اوراق بهادار تهران: رویکرد میانگین‌‌گیری مدل بیزی

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه اقتصاد مالی، پردیس بین‌المللی ارس، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران.

2 دانشیار، گروه اقتصاد، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران.

3 استاد، گروه اقتصاد، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران.

چکیده

هدف: ریسک غیرسیستماتیک، از طریق تنوع‌بخشی سبد دارایی‌ها کاهش می‌یابد؛ از این رو، توجه پژوهشگران و سرمایه‌گذاران، بیش از پیش به ریسک سیستماتیک و عوامل تعیین‌کنندۀ آن معطوف شده است. بحران مالی جهانی ۲۰۰۷ با ایجاد آشفتگی گستردۀ اقتصادی و واکنش‌های زنجیره‌ای در بخش مالی، اهمیت ریسک سیستماتیک را به‌عنوان عاملی کلیدی در پایداری مالی برجسته ساخت. در نتیجه، بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر ریسک سیستماتیک و درک دقیق آن‌ها، پیش‌نیازی برای مدیریت مؤثر ریسک به شمار می‌رود. بتا، به‌عنوان معیار ریسک سیستماتیک، در شرکت‌های غیربورسی، به‌طور مستقیم، از طریق نوسان‌های قیمت سهام سنجیده نمی‌شود و این امر برآورد هزینۀ سرمایه و ریسک نسبی را با چالش مواجه می‌کند. بنابراین، تدوین مدلی برای پیش‌بینی ریسک سیستماتیک بر پایۀ متغیرهای کلان اقتصادی، از اولویت‌های پژوهشی است. با توجه به کثرت متغیرهای بالقوه، هدف اصلی این پژوهش، شناسایی مهم‌ترین متغیرهای کلان اقتصادی مؤثر بر ریسک سیستماتیک سهام در بورس اوراق بهادار ایران است.
روش: با وجود پژوهش‌های گسترده در زمینۀ عوامل ریسک سیستماتیک سهام شرکت‌ها، مدل‌سازی نظری عوامل کلان اقتصادی این متغیر، کمتر در کانون توجه قرار گرفته است و مطالعات موجود، اغلب بر انتخاب دلخواه متغیرهای مستقل، بدون پایۀ نظری جامع استوار است. اختلاف‌نظرهای موجود در خصوص متغیرهای مؤثر، به نتایج ناهمگون در پژوهش‌های پیشین انجامیده است. پژوهش حاضر، با بهره‌گیری از رویکرد میانگین‌گیری مدل بیزی (BMA)، اثرهای متغیرهای کلان اقتصادی بر ریسک سیستماتیک شرکت‌های پذیرفته‌شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران را در بازۀ زمانی ۱۳۹۴ تا ۱۴۰۳ (۷۲ دوره) بررسی می‌کند. با توجه به یکسان بودن مقادیر متغیرهای کلان برای همۀ شرکت‌ها در هر سال، تحلیل مقطعی کافی نیست؛ به همین دلیل، از ریسک سیستماتیک سبدی متشکل از ۵۰ شرکت فعال برتر بازار استفاده شده است. متغیر وابسته، بتای این سبد است و ۱۴ متغیر کلان اقتصادی به‌عنوان متغیر توضیحی بالقوه در نظر گرفته شده است.
یافته‏ها: از میان متغیرهای بررسی‌شده، هشت متغیر بیشترین تأثیر را دارند. شاخص قیمت اجارۀ مسکن و شاخص قیمت مصرف‌کننده، به‌ترتیب رتبه‌های اول و دوم قرار گرفتند. ضریب میانگین اولی مثبت و دومی منفی است. نرخ بیکاری (با ضریب مثبت) و حجم دارایی‌های خارجی نظام بانکی (با ضریب منفی) در رتبه‌های سوم و چهارم قرار گرفتند. نقدینگی با ضریب مثبت در رتبۀ پنجم است. مخارج دولت (اثر منفی) و قیمت سکۀ طلا (اثر مثبت) نیز با احتمال پسین گنجاندن (PIP)، بیش از ۰/۵، به‌عنوان متغیرهای ششم و هفتم شناسایی شدند.
نتیجه‌گیری: یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهد که پیش‌بینی ریسک سیستماتیک سهام و سبدهای سرمایه‌گذاری با استفاده از متغیرهایی چون قیمت اجارۀ مسکن، شاخص قیمت مصرف‌کننده، نرخ بیکاری، دارایی‌های خارجی بانکی، نقدینگی، مخارج دولت و قیمت طلا امکان‌پذیر است. این قابلیت، سرمایه‌گذاران را در مدیریت ریسک سبد یاری می‌رساند و به سیاست‌گذاران اقتصادی و مدیران شرکت‌ها کمک می‌کند تا اقدامات پیشگیرانه و مدیریتی مناسبی برای مقابله با ریسک‌های بازار بورس اتخاذ کنند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Impact of Macroeconomic Variables on the Systematic Risk of the Top 50 Companies on the Tehran Stock Exchange: A Bayesian Model Averaging Approach

نویسندگان [English]

  • Leila Farvizi 1
  • Sakineh Sojoodi 2
  • Hossein Asgharpour 3
  • Jafar Haghighat 3
1 Ph.D Candidate, Department of Financial Economics, Aras International Campus, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.
2 Associate Prof., Department of Economics, Faculty of Management and Accounting, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.
3 Prof., Department of Economics, Faculty of Management and Accounting, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Objective
Since unsystematic risk can be mitigated through diversification of the asset portfolio, the focus of researchers and investors has increasingly shifted towards systematic risk and its determinants. The global financial crisis of 2007 brought significant economic turmoil and triggered a substantial chain reaction within the financial sector, which further amplified the emphasis on systematic risk as a critical factor related to financial stability. Consequently, due to the growing significance of systematic risk and the necessity for companies to respond appropriately, it becomes imperative to investigate the factors that influence systematic risk. In fact, an understanding of the factors impacting the level of systematic risk is a prerequisite for the implementation of effective risk management measures. Moreover, beta, as a measure of systematic risk, cannot be directly assessed through stock price movements for unlisted firms, presenting challenges in estimating the cost of capital and the relative risk profiles of these entities. Therefore, the development of a model capable of predicting systematic risk using macroeconomic variables is a research priority. The multitude of variables that potentially affect systematic risk necessitates experimental research to identify the most salient among them. Therefore, the main goal of this research is to investigate and identify the most important macroeconomic variables that determine the systematic risk of shares in the Iranian Stock Exchange.
 
Methods
Despite the extensive body of research examining the determinants of systematic risk in corporate stock, there exists a paucity of theoretical modeling addressing the macroeconomic determinants of this variable. Furthermore, existing studies often rely on an arbitrary selection of independent variables without comprehensive theoretical foundations. There is considerable debate regarding the variables influencing systematic risk and their inclusion in the model. These differing viewpoints have resulted in disparate outcomes across various studies. Given the importance of systematic risk and the lack of comprehensiveness in prior research, the present study employs the Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) approach to analyze the effects of macroeconomic variables on the systematic risk of companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange during the period from 2015 to 2015, encompassing a total of 72 periods. Recognizing that the values of macroeconomic variables are consistent for all companies within a given year, cross-sectional analysis is deemed inadequate. Thus, this research utilizes the systematic risk of a sample portfolio of stocks over time, specifically selecting a common portfolio comprising 50 actively listed companies in the Iranian stock market. Accordingly, the dependent variable in this study is the beta of the portfolio comprising the 50 most active stocks, with 14 macroeconomic variables identified as potential explanatory variables.
 
Results
The findings indicate that among the variables examined, a total of eight variables exert the most significant influence on systematic risk. Notably, the housing rental price index and the consumer price index rank first and second, respectively, in their impact. The average coefficient for the housing rent variable is positive, while the average coefficient for the consumer price index is negative. Following these, the unemployment rate and the amount of foreign assets held by the banking system rank third and fourth, respectively; the average coefficient for the unemployment rate is positive, whereas foreign assets exhibit a negative average coefficient. Liquidity is positioned fifth with a positive coefficient. Lastly, government expenditures and the price of gold coins serve as the sixth and seventh explanatory variables, respectively, with PIP values exceeding 0.5, demonstrating negative and positive average effects on the systematic risk of the stock portfolio comprising the top 50 companies.
 
Conclusion
According to the findings of this study, it is possible to predict the systematic risk of stocks and stock portfolios using macroeconomic variables such as housing rental prices, consumer price index, unemployment rate, volume of foreign assets of the banking system, volume of liquidity, government spending, and gold price. This prediction helps investors to manage the risk of their portfolio and provides economic policymakers and company managers with the possibility to consider the necessary measures to deal with and manage the risk in the stock market.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Systematic risk
  • Macroeconomic variables
  • Bayesian model averaging method
رضایی، غلامرضا؛ شهرستانی، حمید؛ هژبر کیانی، کامبیز و مهرآرا، محسن (1398). تأثیر سیاست پولی بر بازدهی و بی‌ثباتی بازار سهام (مقایسه‌ای بین ابزارهای سیاست پولی در ایران). تحقیقات مدل‌سازی اقتصادی، 9(36 )، 75-125.
شاه‌آبادی، ابوالفضل؛ نظیری، محمدکاظم و حواج، سحر (1392). اثر متغیرهای کلان اقتصادی بر ریسک سیستماتیک بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. پژوهش‌‏ها و سیاست‌‏های اقتصادی، 21(67)، 89-104.
 
References
Abell, J. D. & Krueger, T. M. (1989). Macroeconomic influences on beta. Journal of Economics and Business, 41(2), 185-193.
Abid, K. G. I., Cretì, A. & Chevallier, J. (2018). Oil price risk and financial contagion. The Energy Journal, 39(2_suppl), 97-116.
Adrangi, B., Chatrath, A., Macri, J. & Raffiee, K. (2021). Dynamics of crude oil price shocks and major Latin American Equity Markets: A study in time and frequency domains. Bulletin of Economic Research, 73(3), 432-455.
Aggarwal R. (1981). Exchange Rates and Stock Prices: A Study of US Capital Markets Under Floating Exchange Rates. Akron Business and Economics Review, 12(2), 7-12.
Al-Qaisi, K. M. (2011). The economic determinants of systematic risk in the Jordanian capital market. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(20).
Andersen, T. G., Bollerslev, T., Diebold, F. X. & Wu, J. (2005). A framework for exploring the macroeconomic determinants of systematic risk. American Economic Review, 95(2), 398-404.
Ang, J. & Ghallab, A. (1976). The impact of US devaluations on the stock prices of multinational corporations. Journal of Business Research, 4(1), 25-34.
Angel, K., Menéndez-Plans, C. & Orgaz-Guerrero, N. (2018). Risk management: Comparative analysis of systematic risk and effect of the financial crisis on US tourism industry: Panel data research. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(3), 1920-1938.
Arfaoui, M. & Abaoub, E. (2010). The determinants of systematic risk: international evidence from the macro-finance interface. Journal of Advanced Studies in Finance, 1(2), 121.
Barro, R. J. (1991). Economic growth in a cross section of countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 407-443.
Bekaert, G. & Harvey, C. R. (2000). Foreign speculators and emerging equity markets. The Journal of Finance, 55(2), 565-613.
Bhattacharya, U. & Daouk, H. (2002). The world price of insider trading. The Journal of Finance, 57(1), 75-108.
Boyd, J.H. & Smith, B.D. (1998). Capital market imperfections in a monetary growth model. Economic Theory, 11, 241-273.
Bruno, M. & Easterly, W. (1998). Inflation crises and long-run growth. Journal of Monetary economics, 41(1), 3-26.
Castro, V. (2013). Macroeconomic determinants of the credit risk in the banking system: The case of the GIPSI. Economic modelling, 31, 672-683.
Cenesizoglu, T. & Ibrushi, D. (2020). Predicting systematic risk with macroeconomic and financial variables. Journal of Financial Research, 43(3), 649-673.
Chee-Wooi, H. & Brooks, R. D. (2015). The components of systematic risk and their determinants in the Malaysian equity market. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance (AAMJAF), 11(2), 151-176.
Chen, N. F., Roll, R. & Ross, S. A. (1986). Economic forces and the stock market. Journal of business, 383-403.
Chinzara, Z. (2011). Macroeconomic uncertainty and conditional stock market volatility in South Africa. South African Journal of Economics, 79(1), 27-49.
Ciccone, A. & Jarociński, M. (2010). Determinants of economic growth: will data tell?. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2(4), 222-246.
Cornelius, P. K. (2011). International investments in private equity: asset allocation, markets, and industry structure. Academic Press.
Cutler, D. M., Poterba, J. M. & Summers, L. H. (1989). SWhat moves stock prices? The Journal of Portfolio Management, 15(3), 3.
Dark, J. (2021). The lead of oil price rises on US equity market beliefs and preferences. Journal of Futures Markets, 41(11), 1861-1887.
De Gregorio, J. (1991). The effects of inflation on economic growth: Lessons from Latin America.
Fakhrunnas, F., Dari, W. & Mifrahi, M. (2018). Macroeconomic effect and risk-taking behavior in a dual banking system. Economic Journal of Emerging Markets, 10(2), 165-176.
Fama, E. F. & French, K. (1992). The cross-section of expected stock returns. Journal of Finance, 47(2), 427–465.
Feldkircher, M. & Zeugner, S. (2012). The impact of data revisions on the robustness of growth determinants—A note on ‘Determinants of Economic Growth: Will Data Tell?  Journal of Applied Econometrics, 27(4), 686-694.
Fernandez, C., Ley, E. & Steel, M. F. (2001). Benchmark priors for Bayesian model averaging. Journal of Econometrics, 100(2), 381-427.
Festić, M., Kavkler, A. & Repina, S. (2011). The macroeconomic sources of systemic risk in the banking sectors of five new EU member states. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(2), 310-322.
Fischer, S. (1993). The role of macroeconomic factors in growth. Journal of monetary economics, 32(3), 485-512.
Flannery, M. J. & Protopapadakis, A. A. (2002). Macroeconomic factors do influence aggregate stock returns. The review of financial studies, 15(3), 751-782.
Frank, P. &Young A. (1972). Stock Price Reaction of Multinational Firms to Exchange Realignments. Financial Management, 1(3), 66-73.
Gary, K. (2003). Bayesian econometrics.
Gopinathan, R. and Durai, S. (2019). Stock market and macroeconomic variables: new evidence from india. Financial Innovation, 5(1).
Gul Cheema, H. N. (2016). Determinants of Systematic Risk: An Empirical Investigation of the South Asian Countries. Master thesis, Department of Management Sciences, Capital University of Science and Technology, Islamabad.
Harrington, D.R. (1987). Modern Portfolio Theory, the Capital Asset Pricing Model, and Arbitrage Pricing Theory: A User's Guide. (2th ed.).
Hoque, M. E. & Zaidi, M. A. S. (2019). The impacts of global economic policy uncertainty on stock market returns in regime switching environment: Evidence from sectoral perspectives. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 24(2), 991-1016.
Humpe, A. and Macmillan, P. (2007). Can macroeconomic variables explain long term stock market movements? a comparison of the us and Japan. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Huong, T. T. X. & Hoai, N. T. T. (2021). Effect of the macroeconomic variables on systemic risk: evidence from Vietnamese economy. Economics and Business Letters, 10(3), 217-228.
Huybens, E. & Smith, B. D. (1998). Financial market frictions, monetary policy, and capital accumulation in a small open economy. Journal of economic theory, 81(2), 353-400.
Huybens, E. & Smith, B. D. (1999). Inflation, financial markets and long-run real activity. Journal of monetary economics, 43(2), 283-315.
Iqbal, M. N., Rehman, M. Z. & Saleem, K. (2018). Impact of Macroeconomic Variables on Stock Markets: Evidence from Frontier Markets like Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX).
Jeffreys, H. (1961). Theory of probability, 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Karakus, R. (2017). Determinants of affecting level from systematic risk: Evidence from BIST 100 companies in Turkey. Eurasian Journal of Business and Economics, 10(20), 33-46.
Kass, R. E. & Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayes factors. Journal of the american statistical association, 90(430), 773-795. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572
Kurter, Z. O. (2024). How macroeconomic conditions affect systemic risk in the short and long-run? The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 70, 102083.
Leamer, E. E. (1978). Regression selection strategies and revealed priors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 73(363), 580-587.
Ley, E. & Steel, M. F. (2009). On the effect of prior assumptions in Bayesian model averaging with applications to growth regression. Journal of applied econometrics, 24(4), 651-674.
Liang, F., Paulo, R., Molina, G., Clyde, M. A. & Berger, J. O. (2008). Mixtures of g priors for Bayesian variable selection. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103(481), 410-423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1198/016214507000001337
Lintner, J. (1965). The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 47(1), 13–37.
Löwen, C., Kchouri, B. & Lehnert, T. (2021). Is this time really different? Flight-to-safety and the COVID-19 crisis. PLoS One, 16(5), e0251752.
Maghyereh, A. I., Awartani, B. & Bouri, E. (2016). The directional volatility connectedness between crude oil and equity markets: New evidence from implied volatility indexes. Energy Economics, 57, 78–93.
Mappadang, A. (2021). Macroeconomic, corporate fundamentals, systematic risk on firm value: evidence from indonesian manufacturing sector. Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 25(4), 836-854.
Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio Selection. Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77–99.
Markowitz, H. (1959). Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments. Cowles Foundation Monograph No. 16. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Mishkin, F. (2010). The Economics of Money, Banking and Financial Markets. Business School Edition, (2nd Edition), Pearson Education, Inc., Boston.
Mishra, P.K., Das J.R. & Mishra, S.K. (2010). Gold Price Volatility and StockMark et Returns In India, American Journal of Scientific Research, (9), 47-55.
Mossin, J. (1966). Equilibrium in a capital asset market. Econometrica, 34, 768–783.
Ngoc, M. (2022). Volatility spillover from the global oil price to asean stock markets: a cross-quantilogram analysis. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance, 18(1), 219-233.
Pandey, V. (2018). Volatility spillover from crude oil and gold to BRICS equity markets. Journal of Economic Studies, 45(2), 426-440.
Patro, D. K., Wald, J. K. & Wu, Y. (2002). The impact of macroeconomic and financial variables on market risk: evidence from international equity returns. European Financial Management, 8(4), 421-447.
Pei, H. & Zhao, J. (2021). The impact of interest rate liberalization on the systemic risk—based on the panel data of commercial banks. Destech Transactions on Economics Business and Management.
Raftery, A. E. (1999). Bayes factors and BIC: Comment on “A critique of the Bayesian information criterion for model selection”. Sociological methods & research, 27(3), 411-427.
Rezaei, Q., Shahrestani, H., Hozhabre kiani, K. & Mehrara, M. (2019). The Impact of Monetary Policy on the Stock Market Returns and Instability: Comparison of Monetary Policy Tools in Iran. Journal of Economic Modeling Research, 10 (36), 75-126. (in Persian)
Robichek, A. A. & Cohn, R. A. (1974). The economic determinants of systematic risk.
Ross, S. A. (1976). The arbitrage theory of capital asset pricing. Journal of Economic Theory, 13(3), 341–360.
Sabetfar, P. (2018). Identification of Risk Factors by Using Macroeconomic and Firm-Specific Variables.
Sabri, M. F. & Wijekoon, R. (2019). The influence of gender and ethnicity on young adults’ participation in financial education programme. Journal of Management and Sustainability, 9(1), 159-170.
Sadorsky, P. (2012). Modeling renewable energy company risk. Energy Policy, 40, 39-48.
Santosa, P. W. & Puspitasari, N. (2019). Corporate Fundamentals, Bi Rate and Systematic Risk: Evidence from Indonesia Stock Exchange. Jurnal Manajemen, 23(1), 40-53.
Schwert, G. W. (1989, September). Business cycles, financial crises, and stock volatility. In Carnegie-Rochester Conference series on public policy (Vol. 31, pp. 83-125). North-Holland.
Shahabadi, A., Naziri M. K. & Havaj, S. (2013). The Effect of Macroeconomic Variables on Systematic Risk of Tehran's Stock Exchange. Quarterly Journal of Economic Research and Policies, 21(67), 89-104. (in Persian)
Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. Journal of Finance, 19(3), 425–442.
Svensson, L. E. (2017). Cost-benefit analysis of leaning against the wind. Journal of Monetary Economics, 90, 193-213.
Verick, S., Schmidt-Klau, D. & Lee, S. (2022). Is this time really different? how the impact of the covid‐19 crisis on labour markets contrasts with that of the global financial crisis of 2008–09. International Labour Review, 161(1), 125-148. https://doi.org/10.1111/ilr.12230
Williams, J. B. (1938). The theory of investment value. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Youssef, M., Mokni, K. & Ajmi, A. N. (2021). Dynamic connectedness between stock markets in the presence of the COVID-19 pandemic: does economic policy uncertainty matter? Financial Innovation, 7(1).
Zellner, A. (1986). Bayesian estimation and prediction using asymmetric loss functions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81(394), 446-451.
Zeugner, S. & Feldkircher, M. (2009). Benchmark priors revisited: on adaptive shrinkage and the supermodel effect in Bayesian model averaging. International Monetary Fund.
Zhang, X., Wei, C., Lee, C. C. & Tian, Y. (2023). Systemic risk of Chinese financial institutions and asset price bubbles. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 64, 101880.