Water Risk and Mining Firms’ Stock Return

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Prof., Department of Financial Management and Insurance, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

2 MSc., DD of Financial Management, Faculty of Accounting and Management , Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Objective
Access to sustainable water resources has recently been raised as a major challenge facing water-dependent companies. The mining industry is one of the huge water users, which can be severely affected by water crises. The purpose of the current research is to test the pricing of water risk in mining companies of the Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE) and to estimate the drop in the value of their shares in the event of a water crisis.
 
Methods
Considering that the availability of water resources hinges on rainfall levels in the catchment area, we assessed water risk using the Standard Precipitation Index (SPI). Employing seasonal data from 2007 to 2011, it used a dynamic panel regression model to assess the effect of water risk on stock returns, controlling for factors such as profitability, leverage, firm size, and capital intensity among 11 companies. Then, the probable loss in a water crisis scenario was calculated using the stress test in the framework of value at risk. Also, the effect of drought hazard index, firm size, and covariance of market return with SPI on the value at risk of firms were investigated.
 
Results
The significance of the water risk effect on stock returns of mining companies indicates the pricing and the confirmation power of this risk factor to explain the changes in stock returns over time, in a way that one unit increase in water risk will cause a decrease of about 3% in the excess return of the firm’s stock three quarters later. Also, the results showed that the amount of rainfall and drought in the region affects the firm's stock returns only up to three seasons, and its long-term effect is zero with a slight tolerance. Additional research findings indicate that during water crises, mining companies may experience a decline in value ranging from 15 to 45 percent. However, there was no direct relationship between the drought risk index and the value at risk of the firm’s value. Further investigations confirmed the existence of a strong relationship between the value at risk and the correlation coefficient of SPI and the market return. This means that the more positive the correlation between SPI and market returns, the greater the value at risk of the firm in water crisis conditions.
 
Conclusion
Water risk can explain part of the changes in stock returns of mining companies. Although companies may be situated in similar drought-prone regions, the level of value at risk for their stocks varies i.e., in case of any water resource crisis, other factors affect water risk other than drought. The shareholders of the larger company will suffer relatively fewer losses due to water risk.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Alessi, L., Ossola, E. & Panzica, R. (2021). What Greenium Matters in The Stock Market? The Role of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Environmental Disclosures. Journal of Financial Stability, 54, 100869.
Annual Report of Corporate Water Disclosure. (2017). Thirsty Business: Why Water is Vital to Climate Action. Available at: https://cdn.cdp.net/cdp-production/cms/reports/documents/ 000/001/323/original/CDP-Global-Water-Summary-2016.pdf?1484741646
Arellano, M. & Bond, S. (1991). Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277-297.
Bansal, P. & Clelland, I. (2004). Talking Trash: Legitimacy, Impression Management, and Unsystematic Risk in the Context of the Natural Environment. Academy of Management Journal, 47(1), 93-103.
Bates, B.C., Kundzewicz, Z.W., Wu, S., Palutikof, J.P. (2008). Climate Change and Water, Technical Paper (VI) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva: IPCC Secretariat.
Battiston, S. (2019). The Importance of Being Forward-looking: Managing Financial Stability in the Face of Climate Risk. Financial Stability Review, (23), 39-48.
Battiston, S., Dafermos, Y. & Monasterolo, I. (2021). Climate Risks and Financial Stability. Journal of Financial Stability, 54, 100867.
Bernick, L. (2017). Why Companies and Investors Need to Value Water Differently. Trucost Blog. March, 17.
Bleanda-Mogosanu, I. (2018). Financial waterBeta: A Portfolio Approach to Value Corporate Water Risk Exposure (Doctoral Thesis).
Bonnafous, L., Lall, U. & Siegel, J. (2017a). An Index for Drought Induced Financial Risk in the Mining Industry. Water Resources Research, 53(2), 1509-1524.
Bonnafous, L., Lall, U. & Siegel, J. (2017b). A Water Risk Index for Portfolio Exposure to Climatic Extremes: Conceptualization and an Application to the Mining Industry. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 21(4), 2075-2106.
Chen, H., Joslin, S. & Tran, N. K. (2012). Rare disasters and risk sharing with heterogeneous beliefs. The Review of Financial Studies, 25(7), 2189-2224.
Choi, S. & Ng, A. (2011). Environmental and economic dimensions of sustainability and price effects on consumer responses. Journal of business ethics, 104(2), 269-282.
Cohen, M. A., Fenn, S. & Naimon, J. S. (1995). Environmental and financial performance: are they related? Washington, DC: Investor Responsibility Research Center, Environmental Information Service.
Derwall, J., Bauer, R., Guenster, N. & Koedijk, K. C. (2004). Socially Responsible Investing: The Eco-Efficiency Premium Puzzle. Available at SSRN 551590.
Dowell, G., Hart, S. & Yeung, B. (2000). Do corporate global environmental standards create or destroy market value?. Management science, 46(8), 1059-1074.
Flannery, M. J. & Rangan, K. P. (2006). Partial adjustment toward target capital structures. Journal of financial economics, 79(3), 469-506.
Freyman, M., Collins, S. & Barton, B. (2015, Updated December 2017). An investor handbook for water risk integration. Boston: Ceres.
Friedman, M. (2007). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. In Corporate ethics and corporate governance (pp. 173-178). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Gray, W. B. & Shadbegian, R. (1993). Environmental regulation and manufacturing productivity at the plant level. NBER Working Paper Seies.
Huynh, T. D., Nguyen, T. H. & Truong, C. (2020). Climate risk: The price of drought. Journal of Corporate Finance, 65, 101750.
Jaffe, A. B., Peterson, S. R., Portney, P. R. & Stavins, R. N. (1995). Environmental regulation and the competitiveness of US manufacturing: what does the evidence tell us?. Journal of Economic literature, 33(1), 132-163.
Jouvenot, V. (2021). Does Water Management Affect Firm Value? Available at: SSRN 4056529.
Karnani, A. G. (2013). Corporate Social Responsibility Does Not Avert the Tragedy of the Commons--Case Study: Coca-Cola India. Ross School of Business Paper, (1210).
Khalamayzer, A. (2016). Are companies prepared for $14 billion in water risk? GreenBiz. November, 15.
Klassen, R. D. & McLaughlin, C. P. (1996). The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Management science, 42(8), 1199-1214.
Kupiec, P. (2002). Stress testing in a value at risk framework. Risk Management: Value at Risk and Beyond, ed. by M. Dempster, 76-99.
Levinson, M. (2008). Watching Water, A guide to evaluating corporate risks in a thirsty world. JP Morgan. Global Equity Research.
Lioui, A. & Sharma, Z. (2012). Environmental corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Disentangling direct and indirect effects. Ecological Economics, 78, 100-111.
Mansouri Daneshvar, M. R., Bagherzadeh, A. & Khosravi, M. (2013). Assessment of drought hazard impact on wheat cultivation using standardized precipitation index in Iran. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 6(11), 4463-4473.
McKee, T. B., Doesken, N. J. & Kleist, J. (1993, January). The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales. In Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Applied Climatology (Vol. 17, No. 22, pp. 179-183).
Miles, M. P. & Covin, J. G. (2000). Environmental marketing: A source of reputational, competitive, and financial advantage. Journal of business ethics, 23(3), 299-311.
Mining Association of Canada. (2004). Towards Sustainable Mining: Guiding Principles. Retrieved from www.mining.ca
Miranda, M., Sauer, A. & Shinde, D. (2010). Mine the gap: connecting water risks and disclosure in the mining sector. World Resources Institute, 2.
Morrison, J., Morikawa, M., Murphy, M. & Schulte, P. (2009). Water Scarcity & climate change. Growing risks for business and investors, Pacific Institute, Oakland, California.
Mudd, G. M. (2008). Sustainability reporting and water resources: a preliminary assessment of embodied water and sustainable mining. Mine Water and the Environment, 27(3), 136-144.
Oberndorfer, U., Schmidt, P., Wagner, M. & Ziegler, A. (2013). Does the stock market value the inclusion in a sustainability stock index? An event study analysis for German firms. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 66(3), 497-509.
Park, A., Gao, S., van Ast, L., Mulder, I. & Nordheim, A. (2015). Water Risk Valuation Tool—Integrating Natural Capital Limits into Financial Analysis of Mining Stocks. Bloomberg and Natural Capital Declaration, Sept.
Raj, A. (2016). The relation between corporate water risk, water accounting and financial performance of metal mining firms (Master's thesis, University of Waterloo).
Ridley, M. & Boland, D. (2015). Integrating water stress into corporate bond credit analysis. German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ). https://vfu. de/ressourcen/publikationen/integrating-water-stress-report-summary_final. pdf.
Ross, S. A. (1977). The capital asset pricing model (CAPM), short-sale restrictions and related issues. The Journal of Finance, 32(1), 177-183.
The 2030 Water Resources Group. (2009). Charting our water future: Economic framework to inform decision-making. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/ dotcom/client_service/sustainability/pdfs/charting%20our%20water%20future/charting_our_water_future_full_report_.ashx
Wagner, M. (2001). A review of empirical studies concerning the relationship between environmental and economic performance: What does the evidence tell us? Centre for Sustainability Management.
Walley, N. & Whitehead, B. (1994). It’s not easy being green. Reader in Business and the Environment, 36(81), 4.
Yamashita, M., Sen, S. & Roberts, M. C. (1999). The rewards for environmental conscientiousness in the US capital markets. Journal of Financial and Strategic Decisions, 12(1), 73-82.
Financial Research Journal
Volume 26, Issue 2
2024
Pages 232-258

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics