The Evaluation of Profitability, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Financial Risk in Asset Management Companies in Iran

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Prof., Department of Accounting, Faculty of Social Sciences and Economics, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran.

2 BSc., Department of Accounting, Faculty of Social Sciences and Economics, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Objective: There are many perspectives on the interplay of profitability, Corporate social responsibility (CSR), and financial risk in different industries. The purpose of this paper is to examine the factors affecting the success of asset management companies (AMC) in Iran from a financial and social point of view. Since the asset management industry in Iran is emerging and the first AMC was founded in 2011, not much research has been conducted in this field. Therefore, this study tries to contribute to the extant literature by investigating the interactive effect of profitability, CSR, and financial risk. It also seeks to document empirical evidence in this industry.
Methods: To fulfill the purposes, the researchers examined 45 AMCs licensed by the Stock Exchange and Securities Organization through cross-sectional regression models and correlation tests. Comparatively, the correlation between information related to social responsibility using KLD checklist scores and assets under management of 51 large foreign AMC was tested. The KLD checklist consisted of seven different concepts: environmental, products and services, human resources, customer ship, social, culture and belief, and energy. Previous studies used many different factors to score CSR but this study computed CSR scores following Kordestani & et al. (2018)
Results: The results proved the coefficients of mutual funds management fee (especially fixed funds fee) to be higher than the coefficients of the portfolio management fee in explaining profitability. It was also found that the number of employees and the average financial risk do not impact profitability. In addition, CSR does not relate to any of the following variables; the profitability, the fees and the number of managed portfolios, the fees and the number of mutual funds, the number of companies in the group, the financial risk as well as the number of assets under management. The comparative study of 51 large foreign AMCs also revealed that compliance with CSR disclosure requirements in the world has a significant relationship with profitability.
Conclusion: AMCs could be more profitable by focusing on mutual funds development than on portfolio expansion, especially if they establish a fixed fund. As a result, we suggest newcomers constitute fixed mutual funds as the first action plan. Our observation showed that the average debt ratio in the asset management industry hovered around 32%, of which 28% belonged to short-term debts. This revealed that the active AMCs mostly preferred short-term debts to long-term ones. So, we concluded that these AMCs avoided financial risk in favor of the high business risk of the industry. To provide financial success, they should enhance their network via having a vast group community and robust their beneficial activities and their synergy among the whole group. Also, due to the voluntary disclosure of CSR in Iran, there is no sufficient information and the average related information is very low (about 11%).

Keywords

Main Subjects


 
Ashtab, A., Haghighat, H., & Kordestani, G. R. (2018). Investigating the Relationship between Predicted Financial Distress and Earnings management Approaches Based on Structural Equations. Financial Research Journal, 20(4), 467-488. doi: 10.22059/frj.2018.232156.1006437 (in Persian)
Ebrahim Nejad, A., Barakchian, S. M., & Neshat Omidvaran, N. (2021). The Disposition Effect in Mutual Funds: Evidence from Iran. Financial Research Journal23(2), 222-248. doi: 10.22059/frj.2021.297422.1006993 (in Persian)
Ebrahimi Sarveolia, M., Rostami Asrabadi, N. & Fahami,‌ E. (2016). Smart Money Effect in Mutual Funds. Financial Research Journal,‌ 18(1),‌1-22. ‌(in Persian)
Fallah Shams, M. & Banisharif, A. (2021). Investigating the Financial Risk Spillover in Banks Accepted in Tehran Stock Exchange Market through MGARCH Approach. Financial Research Journal, 23(1), 87-107. doi: 10.22059/frj.2020.304816.1007033(in Persian)
Hidayat, D.W.W. (2017). The Influence of Size, Return on Equity, and Leverage on the disclosure of the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Manufacturing Companies, ubharajaya, 5 (8), 57-66.
Kapitan, V. S., & Ikram, S. (2019). The influence of profitability and leverage on corporate social responsibility disclosure. Journal of Accounting Auditing and Business, 2(2), 14-25.
KhanAhmadi, M. Dastgir, M. & Ahmadi, S. (2021). An Investigation of the Relationship between Profitability and Company Reputations on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure in Iran. Financial Economics, 15, 55, 1400, 269-296. (in Persian)
Khodayari, P., barzegari khanagha, J., Jafari Nadoushan, A. (2022). A Review of the Civil Liability of Portfolio Management Companies in Iranian Law. Jurisprudence and Islamic Law, 13(29), 25-53. doi: 10.22034/law.2022.49536.3050(in Persian)
Kordestani, G., Ghaderzadeh, K. & Haghighat, H. (2018). Impact of social responsibility disclosure on accounting, economic and market based Measures of corporate performance evaluation, Journal of Accounting Advances, 10(1), 187-217. (in Persian)
Mohammadi Nodeh, F. & Jafari, F. (2020). The impact of financial leverage on the profitibilitiy of the TSE listed firms. Journal of Accounting & Economic Research, 5(10), 25-36.
(in Persian)

Movahedi, S. & Hosseini, A. (2021). Investigating the Impact of Social Responsibility on Capital Structure, Journal of Capital Market Analysis, 1(1), 177-206. (in Persian)

Nabizade, A., & Sepahvand, F. (2020). The Effect of Active Management on Mutual Fund Performance in Tehran Stock Exchange Market. Financial Research Journal, 22(3), 366-387. doi: 10.22059/frj.2020.291722.1006949. (in Persian)

Naderi Khorshidi, A. & Solgi, M. (2015). Investigating the impact of inter organization elements and industry structure on corporate social responsibility in Tehran Stock Exchange, Journal of Business Management, 7(1), 209-229. (in Persian)

Nwaneri, C. (2015). The impact of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on organization‌ profitability. International‌Journal‌of‌Business‌and‌Management, ‌1‌0(9), ‌60.
Oktavianawati, L. & Wahyuningrum, I. F. S. (2019).‌Factors affecting corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure. Accounting Analysis Journal, 8(2), 110-117.
Ramadhanty, N. S. & Budiasih, N. I. G. A. (2020). The Effect of Financial Leverage on Stock Returns with Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure as Moderating Variable ‌(Empirical Study on Mining Companies Listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2016-2018). American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research (AJHSSR), 4(6), 48-53.
Rezaei Pitenoei, Y., Gholamrezapoor, M., Amirnia, N. & Kazemi, P. (2021). Business Strategy and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure. Journal of accounting knowledge‎, 12(2), 67-86.‎ (in Persian)
Riantani, S. & Nurzamzam, H. (2015). Analysis of Company Size, Financial Leverage, and Profitability and its Effect to CSR Disclosure. Journal Dinamika Manajemen, 6(2).
Sciarelli, M., Tani, M., Landi, G. & Turriziani, L. (2019). CSR perception and financial performance: Evidences from Italian and UK asset management companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 841-851.
Sheikh, S. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and firm leverage: The impact of market competition. Research in International Business and Finance, 48, 496-510.
Swandari, F. & Sadikin, A. (2016). The effect of ownership structure, profitability, leverage, and firm size on corporate social responsibility (CSR). Binus Business Review, 7(3), 315-320.
Wijayanti, I. Mawardi, R. & Halim, A. B. (2020). The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure, Leverage, Firm Size, and Profitability toward Earnings Response Coefficient. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 13(3), 1202-1216.