A Financial Evaluation Model for Insurance Companies’ Management of Claimed Loss Risks under Normal and Crisis Conditions

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Prof., Department of Property and Casualty Insurance, Iranian Insurance Research Center, Tehran, Iran.

2 Assistant Prof., Department of Management, Faculty of Social Sciences and Economics, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Assistant Prof., Department of General Insurance, Iranian Insurance Research Center, Tehran, Iran.

10.22059/frj.2026.404825.1007807

Abstract

Objective
While insurance companies operate with profit-maximization objectives similar to those of other economic sectors, they possess distinct structural characteristics in financial intermediation. Owing to their role in risk transfer and the resulting concentration of risk, their operational sustainability is uniquely vulnerable. Traditional financial solvency ratios, although effective in assessing capital adequacy, do not necessarily ensure short-term liquidity resilience during catastrophic, fat-tailed loss events. Accordingly, this study aims to develop a model for assessing the resilience of insurance companies in managing claims risk under both normal and critical scenarios, without reliance on restrictive prior assumptions regarding loss distributions.
 
 
 
Methods
This study employs an applied, descriptive-analytical research design, focusing on the analysis of historical data from the insurance sector. The statistical population comprises all general insurance companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE) over the period from 2014 to 2024. Sample selection was contingent upon data accessibility and the availability of quarterly financial statements. The dataset incorporates quarterly financial reports and internal corporate records, specifically the total number of issued policies, total written and collected premiums, and the aggregate frequency and severity of paid claims on a quarterly basis. To mitigate inflationary distortions, monetary variables—specifically claim amounts and asset values—were adjusted for inflation using the Consumer Price Index (CPI). Subsequently, a logarithmic differencing filter was applied to detrend the data and ensure stationarity. In the final phase, optimal statistical distributions were fitted to the empirical data. The financial health of insurers was then evaluated by defining and calculating three novel metrics: the Risk Status Index, the Risk Coverage Ratio (Normal Condition), and the Risk Coverage Ratio (Critical Condition).
 
Results
The results demonstrate that the proposed indicators exhibit significantly greater explanatory power than conventional regulatory solvency ratios. The findings indicate that even entities maintaining a standard regulatory solvency ratio (Level 1) may experience “hidden insolvency” as a result of inefficiencies in managing asset quality and liquidity.
 
Conclusion
The proposed model establishes that liquidity risk management must be integrated as an essential complement to traditional solvency frameworks. Implementation of this model enables supervisory authorities to identify early warning signals prior to the onset of irreversible financial distress.

Keywords

Main Subjects


 
Alsofiani, A. (2022). A review of the empirical literature on the determinants of insurers' financial performance. International Journal of Business and Globalisation, 30(3-4), 478-487.
Anggriheny, B. R. & Nababan, R. Y. (2022). Due to the Legal Failure to Pay by the Insurance of the Insurance Policy of the Insured. Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal, 7(1), 29-44.
Asadi, S., Albadvi, A. & Husseinzadeh Kashan, A. (2017). Determining capital requirement for market risk in the solvency assessment model of insurance companies. Iranian Journal of Insurance Research, 6(3), 199-210. doi: 10.22056/ijir.2017.03.05 (in Persian)
Bunni, N. G. & Bunni, L. B. (2022). Risk and insurance in construction. Routledge.
Cocozza, R., Di Lorenzo, E. & Sibillo, M. (2004). Methodological problems in solvency assessment of an insurance company. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 2, 95-102. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/27980.
Cox, D. R. (2006). Principles of statistical inference. Cambridge university press.
Deloitte. (2024). 2025 global insurance outlook. https://www.ey.com/content/dam/ey-unified-site/ey-com/en-gl/insights/insurance/documents/ey-gl-global-insurance-outlook-01-2025.pdf
Eggers, P. M. (2023). Damages for Late Payment of Insurance Claims. In Damages, Recoveries and Remedies in Shipping Law, 174-194. Informa Law from Routledge.
Embrechts, P., Klüppelberg, C. & Mikosch, T. (2013). Modelling extremal events: for insurance and finance (Vol. 33). Springer Science & Business Media.
Garayeta, A., De la Peña, J. I. & Trigo, E. (2022a). Towards a global solvency model in the insurance market: a qualitative analysis. Sustainability, 14(11), 6465.
Garayeta, A., De la Peña, J. I. & Trigo, E. (2022b). Exploratory Analysis of Solvency Regulations in the Three Main Latin American Insurance Markets. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, 24, 516-532.
‎ Gharakhani, M. & Majedi, Z. (2013). Calculating risk coefficients in solvency of insurance companies using value at risk. Iranian Journal of Insurance Research2(4), 368-384. doi: 10.22056/ijir.2013.04.06 (in Persian)
Halbleib, R. & Pohlmeier, W. (2012). Improving the value at risk forecasts: Theory and evidence from the financial crisis. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 36(8), 1212-1228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2011.10.005.
IAA (2004). A Global Framework for Insurer Solvency Assessment. Ottawa: IAA. http://www. actuaries. org/LIBRARY/Papers/Global_Framework_ Insurer_Solvency_Assessment-members. Pdf.
International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS). (2009). Issues paper on group-wide solvency assessment and supervision. https://www.iais.org/uploads/2022/01/Issues_paper_on_group_wide_solvency_assessment_and_supervision.pdf.pdf
Johnson, N. L., Kotz, S. & Balakrishnan, N. (1995). Continuous univariate distributions, volume 2 (Vol. 289). John wiley & sons.
Kamau, A.M. (2023). Underwriting risk, firm size and financial performance of insurance firms in Kenya. Eastern Journal of Economics and Finance, 8(1).
Klugman, S. A., Panjer, H. H. & Willmot, G. E. (2012). Loss models: from data to decisions (Vol. 715). John Wiley & Sons.
Labini, S. S., D’Apolito, E. & Nyenno, I. (2024). Systemic Risk and the Insurance Sector: A Network Perspective. In Systemic Risk and Complex Networks in Modern Financial Systems, 211-228. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
O’Donnell, R. (1987). Real and Nominal quantities. In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 1-3. Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Park, J. & Shin, M. (2022). An Approach for Variable Selection and Prediction Model for Estimating the Risk-Based Capital (RBC) Based on Machine Learning Algorithms. Risks, 10(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks10010013
Safari, A. & Shahriar, B. (2012). Designing a Financial Supervision System for Iranian Insurance Companies Using Overseas Experiences. Research project, Tehran: Insurance Research. (in Persian)
Sasikumar, K. & Fernando, J. M. R. (2022). Risk Management and Firm Financial Performance: A Study on Listed Insurance Companies in Sri Lanka. 11th Students' Research Symposium 2022.
Shahriar, B. & Saiadzadeh, A. (2016). Designing a Model for Running Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) in Insurance Companies. Research project, Tehran: Insurance Research. (in Persian)
Shahriar, B., Saiadzadeh, A. & Emdadi, F. (2016). Providing a Regulation Model on Calculation and Supervision of Insurance Companies Solvency (By-law 69 of the Supreme Insurance Council). Research project, Tehran: Insurance Research. (in Persian)
Tadikamalla, P. R. (1980). A look at the Burr and related distributions. International Statistical Review/Revue Internationale de Statistique, 337-344. https://doi.org/10.2307/1402945.
Voutilainen, R. (2022). Notes on Insurance Company Solvency. Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, 6(5), 30-43.
Wang, K. & Zhu, L. (2021). Solvency Evaluation Model of Insurance Company Based on Stochastic Differential Equation. Complexity, 1-12.https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5594619.