<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Financial Research Journal</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1024-8153</Issn>
				<Volume>10</Volume>
				<Issue>26</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2009</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>20</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Evaluation of Base Metals Companies in Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE) Using EVA Model and its relation with Profit accounting criteria</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Evaluation of Base Metals Companies in Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE) Using EVA Model and its relation with Profit accounting criteria</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage></FirstPage>
			<LastPage></LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">20029</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mehdi</FirstName>
					<LastName>Abzari</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Saied</FirstName>
					<LastName>Samady</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Naser</FirstName>
					<LastName>Izadi Nia</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mojtaba</FirstName>
					<LastName>Dehghanpour</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>1970</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Nowadays, in the competitive world of Economy, the most considerable issues for managers and Shareholders are: 1- Managers are after productivity growth with optimum Use of financial sources and 2- investors require long-term Return from their investment. This standpoint and motivation to increase productivity for managers is the direct consequence of the advent of a new generation of investors. Economic Value Added is good criterion for better investment and can guide managers to increase productivity. EVA can best substitute traditional profit indicators and used for managers evaluate. This study surveys the relation between Economic Value Added and accounting criteria (Earnings Per Share and Total Shareholders Return) in Base Metals Companies in the period of time between 2006 and 2008. Finally, Economic Value Added Companies is standardized to compare. The hypotheses are examined using Descriptive Statistics and Pearson Correlation coefficient analysis. The results of this study show that there is no meaningful relation between Economic Value Added and accounting indicators. Standardizing calculated Economic Value Added for companies under consideration denote that Kalsimin Co. and Khuzestan Steel Co. have the best and the Worst Performances respectively</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Nowadays, in the competitive world of Economy, the most considerable issues for managers and Shareholders are: 1- Managers are after productivity growth with optimum Use of financial sources and 2- investors require long-term Return from their investment. This standpoint and motivation to increase productivity for managers is the direct consequence of the advent of a new generation of investors. Economic Value Added is good criterion for better investment and can guide managers to increase productivity. EVA can best substitute traditional profit indicators and used for managers evaluate. This study surveys the relation between Economic Value Added and accounting criteria (Earnings Per Share and Total Shareholders Return) in Base Metals Companies in the period of time between 2006 and 2008. Finally, Economic Value Added Companies is standardized to compare. The hypotheses are examined using Descriptive Statistics and Pearson Correlation coefficient analysis. The results of this study show that there is no meaningful relation between Economic Value Added and accounting indicators. Standardizing calculated Economic Value Added for companies under consideration denote that Kalsimin Co. and Khuzestan Steel Co. have the best and the Worst Performances respectively</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">correlation coefficient</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Earnings Per Share</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Economic Value Added</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Standardized EVA</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Total shareholder Return</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Financial Research Journal</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1024-8153</Issn>
				<Volume>10</Volume>
				<Issue>26</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2009</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>20</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Performance Assessment of Valuation Models in Tehran Stock Exchange</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Performance Assessment of Valuation Models in Tehran Stock Exchange</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage></FirstPage>
			<LastPage></LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">20030</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Gholam Reza</FirstName>
					<LastName>Eslami-Bidgoli</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Saeed</FirstName>
					<LastName>Bajalan</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Vahid</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mahmoodi</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>1970</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>This paper examines the accuracy of valuation models in providing reasonable estimation of the market values of listed companies in Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE). Six valuation models including Gordon Growth Model, Two Stage Dividend discount Model, Adjusted Present Value, Price to Earning ratio and Residual Income were examined in this study. In addition, three proxies represent the market values of stock during year: Max {Min}, Min {Max} and Average. The comparison was made in terms of models’ Median Absolute Percentage Errors (MdAPEs). Wilcoxon’s Rank Sum non-parametric test was used in order to test the hypothesis of significant difference among valuation models MdAPEs. The results revealed that Price to Earning ratio gives the most accurate estimation of the market values of companies while the Residual Income model and Free Cash Flow to Equity holder model have the poorest performance which is in total contradiction with the results of other researches conducted in other parts of the world.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">This paper examines the accuracy of valuation models in providing reasonable estimation of the market values of listed companies in Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE). Six valuation models including Gordon Growth Model, Two Stage Dividend discount Model, Adjusted Present Value, Price to Earning ratio and Residual Income were examined in this study. In addition, three proxies represent the market values of stock during year: Max {Min}, Min {Max} and Average. The comparison was made in terms of models’ Median Absolute Percentage Errors (MdAPEs). Wilcoxon’s Rank Sum non-parametric test was used in order to test the hypothesis of significant difference among valuation models MdAPEs. The results revealed that Price to Earning ratio gives the most accurate estimation of the market values of companies while the Residual Income model and Free Cash Flow to Equity holder model have the poorest performance which is in total contradiction with the results of other researches conducted in other parts of the world.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Market Value Proxy</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Median Absolute Percent Errors</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Sustainable Growth Rate</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Valuation</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Financial Research Journal</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1024-8153</Issn>
				<Volume>10</Volume>
				<Issue>26</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2009</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>20</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Studying the Effect of Ownership Structure on Performance of Companies Accepted in Tehran Stock Exchange</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Studying the Effect of Ownership Structure on Performance of Companies Accepted in Tehran Stock Exchange</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage></FirstPage>
			<LastPage></LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">20031</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mohammad Ali</FirstName>
					<LastName>Babaie-Zakliki</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Zhila</FirstName>
					<LastName>Ahmadvand</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>1970</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The conflict between investors&#039; interests and managers is an important issue which has been attracted researchers attentions in last decade. According to the related literature, corporate governance body of research has offered alternatives for solving this problem such as Ownership structure. This research investigates the effect of ownership structure on firm performance. The factors which identified ownership structure were the number of block holders and kind of ownership were studied. Meanwhile, industry factor was applied in the research model. The samples include 56 firms whose shares&#039; transactions were active in Iran security exchange market from 1999 to 2004. The firms were classified according to their kind of ownership which   involve private, semiprivate, public, semipublic and institutions (NGOs). By applying multiple correlation and analysis of variance statistical tests, it was found that ROE ratio is affected by the industry factor ,but the difference of P/E ratio between studied industries was not significant.We have found when the number of block holders increase, ROE ratio also increase. This finding can be explained for strong control by large shareholders and enforcing their synergy in decision making. According to the sample size, some the relationships between ownership structure factors and firm performance was not significant. Other results show that the large equity ownership by a mix of private and public sectors in firm ownership structure improve return on equities firm due to the role of government in governing and controlling the firms. Finally, the results show that performance of corporations in Iran security exchange was affected mostly by industry and economical circumstances rather than managerial decisions and ownership structure.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The conflict between investors&#039; interests and managers is an important issue which has been attracted researchers attentions in last decade. According to the related literature, corporate governance body of research has offered alternatives for solving this problem such as Ownership structure. This research investigates the effect of ownership structure on firm performance. The factors which identified ownership structure were the number of block holders and kind of ownership were studied. Meanwhile, industry factor was applied in the research model. The samples include 56 firms whose shares&#039; transactions were active in Iran security exchange market from 1999 to 2004. The firms were classified according to their kind of ownership which   involve private, semiprivate, public, semipublic and institutions (NGOs). By applying multiple correlation and analysis of variance statistical tests, it was found that ROE ratio is affected by the industry factor ,but the difference of P/E ratio between studied industries was not significant.We have found when the number of block holders increase, ROE ratio also increase. This finding can be explained for strong control by large shareholders and enforcing their synergy in decision making. According to the sample size, some the relationships between ownership structure factors and firm performance was not significant. Other results show that the large equity ownership by a mix of private and public sectors in firm ownership structure improve return on equities firm due to the role of government in governing and controlling the firms. Finally, the results show that performance of corporations in Iran security exchange was affected mostly by industry and economical circumstances rather than managerial decisions and ownership structure.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Corporate governance</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Ownership Structure</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Price to Earning Ratio</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Return on Equity Ratio</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Financial Research Journal</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1024-8153</Issn>
				<Volume>10</Volume>
				<Issue>26</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2009</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>20</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Prioritize Effective Financial Factors on Price Stock in Tehran Stock Exchange with Using TOPSIS Method</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Prioritize Effective Financial Factors on Price Stock in Tehran Stock Exchange with Using TOPSIS Method</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage></FirstPage>
			<LastPage></LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">20032</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mojtaba</FirstName>
					<LastName>Pakdin Amiri</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Morteza</FirstName>
					<LastName>Pakdin Amiri</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Alireza</FirstName>
					<LastName>Pakdin Amiri</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>1970</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The goal of this research was prioritize effective financial factors on price stock in Tehran stock exchange with using TOPSIS method. Based on, it was reviewed literature and interviews and specially questionnaire obtain, effective financial factors to analysis with emphasize on TOPSIS technique. The results shown in the entire ratio price to income, historical event share, EPS and return on assets factors were most effect on price index. Finally, it is presented concluding, discussion, implications for managers, and directions for further research.The goal of this research was prioritize effective financial factors on price stock in Tehran stock exchange with using TOPSIS method. Based on, it was reviewed literature and interviews and specially questionnaire obtain, effective financial factors to analysis with emphasize on TOPSIS technique. The results shown in the entire ratio price to income, historical event share, EPS and return on assets factors were most effect on price index. Finally, it is presented concluding, discussion, implications for managers, and directions for further research.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The goal of this research was prioritize effective financial factors on price stock in Tehran stock exchange with using TOPSIS method. Based on, it was reviewed literature and interviews and specially questionnaire obtain, effective financial factors to analysis with emphasize on TOPSIS technique. The results shown in the entire ratio price to income, historical event share, EPS and return on assets factors were most effect on price index. Finally, it is presented concluding, discussion, implications for managers, and directions for further research.The goal of this research was prioritize effective financial factors on price stock in Tehran stock exchange with using TOPSIS method. Based on, it was reviewed literature and interviews and specially questionnaire obtain, effective financial factors to analysis with emphasize on TOPSIS technique. The results shown in the entire ratio price to income, historical event share, EPS and return on assets factors were most effect on price index. Finally, it is presented concluding, discussion, implications for managers, and directions for further research.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Financial Factors</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Price index</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Stock exchange</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">TOPSIS</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Financial Research Journal</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1024-8153</Issn>
				<Volume>10</Volume>
				<Issue>26</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2009</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>20</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Comparing  Semivariance and Calculated Beta on Basis of it to the Variance and Common Beta</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Comparing  Semivariance and Calculated Beta on Basis of it to the Variance and Common Beta</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage></FirstPage>
			<LastPage></LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">20033</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Reza</FirstName>
					<LastName>Tehrani</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Moslem</FirstName>
					<LastName>Peymany</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>1970</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>In this article the researcher, comparing Semivariance and calculated Beta on basis of it to the variance and common Beta, has tried to see whether Downside Beta criteria (Semivariance and calculated Beta on basis of it) have any preference over the common risk criteria (variance and common Bata) or not. In order to achieve this, weekly data of 55 sample companies were gathered in a 6-year period (from the early 1378 to the late 1383) and tested. The results obtained show that among risk criteria, downside risk criteria have preference over common risk criteria</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">In this article the researcher, comparing Semivariance and calculated Beta on basis of it to the variance and common Beta, has tried to see whether Downside Beta criteria (Semivariance and calculated Beta on basis of it) have any preference over the common risk criteria (variance and common Bata) or not. In order to achieve this, weekly data of 55 sample companies were gathered in a 6-year period (from the early 1378 to the late 1383) and tested. The results obtained show that among risk criteria, downside risk criteria have preference over common risk criteria</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Downside Beta</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Downside Risk</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">risk</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Semivariance</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Financial Research Journal</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1024-8153</Issn>
				<Volume>10</Volume>
				<Issue>26</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2009</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>20</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>An examination of Factors Associated with Reliance of External Auditors on Internal Auditors Work</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>An examination of Factors Associated with Reliance of External Auditors on Internal Auditors Work</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage></FirstPage>
			<LastPage></LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">20034</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mohammad Reza</FirstName>
					<LastName>Nikbakht</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mohammad Mehdi</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mazinezhad</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>1970</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The main purpose of this  paper is survy of factors associated with reliance of external auditors on entenal adutors  work , Reliance on internal auditors work has significant influence on cost saving and obtaining more services to client with the same cost. Optimal utilization of internal audit work can improve both the efficiency and the effectiveness of external audits and can enhance the value of internal audits to the client organization. The objective of this study is reorganization of factors associated with reliance of external auditors on internal auditors work from CPAs view. Methodology of this study is survey and needed data we use Pearson correlation coefficient and multiple regression. The results indicate competence, work performance, due professional and inherent risk level have significantly positive valuation with reliance of external auditors on internal auditors work.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The main purpose of this  paper is survy of factors associated with reliance of external auditors on entenal adutors  work , Reliance on internal auditors work has significant influence on cost saving and obtaining more services to client with the same cost. Optimal utilization of internal audit work can improve both the efficiency and the effectiveness of external audits and can enhance the value of internal audits to the client organization. The objective of this study is reorganization of factors associated with reliance of external auditors on internal auditors work from CPAs view. Methodology of this study is survey and needed data we use Pearson correlation coefficient and multiple regression. The results indicate competence, work performance, due professional and inherent risk level have significantly positive valuation with reliance of external auditors on internal auditors work.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Auditors on External</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Auditors Work Optimal</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Reline of External</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Utilization of Internal Audit</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Financial Research Journal</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1024-8153</Issn>
				<Volume>10</Volume>
				<Issue>26</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2009</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>20</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The Comparison of The Stocks Price in Government Firms Including Privatization with their Priced Stocks Based on Price-Earnings Ratio Model (P/E) of Similar Firms</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>The Comparison of The Stocks Price in Government Firms Including Privatization with their Priced Stocks Based on Price-Earnings Ratio Model (P/E) of Similar Firms</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage></FirstPage>
			<LastPage></LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">20035</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mohammad Hossein</FirstName>
					<LastName>Vadiee</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Said</FirstName>
					<LastName>Asyabani</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>1970</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Today, a way of gaining constant and dynamic development is reforming of the ownerships structure, from governmental ownership to privatization ownership. So this policy in many countries, especially in developing countries, as a strategic policy has been used. Compilation and performing principle 44, s policies of Iran Islamic Republic Law Constitution which Parliament has confirmed. One of the best ways of privatization is denoting stocks by stock change and one of the most important points to reach fulfillment is how to price the denoted stocks. Because of the importance and greatness of pricing stocks, So far many models based on different thoughts have been offered that regarding with economic, politic, regional and other conditions have shown various and different usages. Then, in this research, the denoted price of government firms including privatization has been compared and studied with these stocks based on theoretical scientific model in Tehran Stocks. So among evaluation models of stocks in point of comparable firms, view, Price-Earnings Ratio Model (P/E) of similar firms has been selected and then the prices of government firms including denoted based on this model during 2005, 2006 and 2007 have been calculated, and then studied and compared. The results of this research indicate that there is no meaningful relation between the prices of the denoted stocks and the prices obtained from Price-Earnings Ratio Model (P/E) of similar firms. Also, there is a direct meaningful relation, with high care between them. The Findings of this research indicates that Privatization Organization can use of Price-Earnings Ration (P/E) of similar firms in searching of making the best of approved stock pricing.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Today, a way of gaining constant and dynamic development is reforming of the ownerships structure, from governmental ownership to privatization ownership. So this policy in many countries, especially in developing countries, as a strategic policy has been used. Compilation and performing principle 44, s policies of Iran Islamic Republic Law Constitution which Parliament has confirmed. One of the best ways of privatization is denoting stocks by stock change and one of the most important points to reach fulfillment is how to price the denoted stocks. Because of the importance and greatness of pricing stocks, So far many models based on different thoughts have been offered that regarding with economic, politic, regional and other conditions have shown various and different usages. Then, in this research, the denoted price of government firms including privatization has been compared and studied with these stocks based on theoretical scientific model in Tehran Stocks. So among evaluation models of stocks in point of comparable firms, view, Price-Earnings Ratio Model (P/E) of similar firms has been selected and then the prices of government firms including denoted based on this model during 2005, 2006 and 2007 have been calculated, and then studied and compared. The results of this research indicate that there is no meaningful relation between the prices of the denoted stocks and the prices obtained from Price-Earnings Ratio Model (P/E) of similar firms. Also, there is a direct meaningful relation, with high care between them. The Findings of this research indicates that Privatization Organization can use of Price-Earnings Ration (P/E) of similar firms in searching of making the best of approved stock pricing.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Government Firms</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Price-Earnings Ratio</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Privatization</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Similar Firms</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Stocks Price</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
