<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Univrsity Of Tehran Press</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Financial Research Journal</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1024-8153</Issn>
				<Volume>13</Volume>
				<Issue>31</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2011</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The Anatomy of Value and Growth Stocks Capital Gain Return and Dividend Yield in the Tehran Stock Exchange</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>The Anatomy of Value and Growth Stocks Capital Gain Return and Dividend Yield in the Tehran Stock Exchange</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>121</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>146</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">23829</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mehdi</FirstName>
					<LastName>Miavaghi</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Farrokh</FirstName>
					<LastName>Dehdar</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>1970</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>This study examines the empirical validity of claims that value stocks (stocks with high ratios of book value to price) have higher average returns than growth stocks (stocks with low book-to-market ratios). The analyses are performed using data pertaining to 70 firms for the period 1381-1389 and used the Panel Data methodology.
 This paper contains significant and consistent results. The results of testing hypotheses for each of the nine years and the pooled sample show that price-to-book ratio and Size are positively related to Stock Return. The results demonstrated that On average, growth stocks have higher Total Return than value stocks, and growth stocks (especially big growth stocks) also have higher average rates of 
capital gain. The results also demonstrated that the average returns growth portfolios tend to fall in the years after portfolio formation. Conversely, average returns value portfolios tend to rise in the years after portfolio formation, as some value stocks restructure, their profitability improves.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">This study examines the empirical validity of claims that value stocks (stocks with high ratios of book value to price) have higher average returns than growth stocks (stocks with low book-to-market ratios). The analyses are performed using data pertaining to 70 firms for the period 1381-1389 and used the Panel Data methodology.
 This paper contains significant and consistent results. The results of testing hypotheses for each of the nine years and the pooled sample show that price-to-book ratio and Size are positively related to Stock Return. The results demonstrated that On average, growth stocks have higher Total Return than value stocks, and growth stocks (especially big growth stocks) also have higher average rates of 
capital gain. The results also demonstrated that the average returns growth portfolios tend to fall in the years after portfolio formation. Conversely, average returns value portfolios tend to rise in the years after portfolio formation, as some value stocks restructure, their profitability improves.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Growth stocks</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">price-to-book ratio</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Stock Return</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Value stocks</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jfr.ut.ac.ir/article_23829_a2860aa1f4d1d928cbaebfd142f8907d.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
